| Affix function | number of borrowed affixes |
|---|---|
Information and examples are from Pakendorf (2012), see also Pakendorf (2009; 2010), who counts fewer borrowed affixes because of adopting different criteria. The ones given here are all attested with native stems, even though examples of hybrid formations are only given for a few here. Note that there is some formal overlap in the person-number markers of the three different paradigms.
4 mood markers
5 subject markers for necessitative mood and indicative mood (out of 6 such subject markers), combining with -jAktAːk ‘necessitative’ and -A ~ -Ar ‘indicative present tense’. Third person singular is unmarked.
5 subject markers for assertive mood (all 5 borrowed), combining with -dAg ~ -dAk ‘assertive’. No second person plural form occurs in the corpus, since the assertive mood gives a strong nuance of emphasis to the assertion that would not be used with reference to the addressee.
5 subject markers for hypothetical mood (all 5 borrowed), combining with -jAk ~ -jAːg ‘hypothetical mood’. First and second person plural forms do not occur in the corpus.
1 non-interrelated suffix
Note that two further Sakha affixes are found in the corpus, but only rarely occurring on Ėven stems, or in contexts where Sakha might be the matrix language, in which case Ėven words receive Sakha inflection. Therefore, they are not counted here. These are (i) -An ‘perfective (sequential) converb’, e.g. ič-e-j-en (see-epenthetic-connective-perfective.converb) ‘yes, they do see’; and (ii) -BAt ‘negative present’, which stands in paradigmatic opposition to -Ar ‘indicative present tense’, e.g. haː-j-bat (know-connective-negative) ‘(I) did not know’.